pchamp5 wrote:
bottom of page 7 is interesting too:
<<
In the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Engineering group re-evaluated a number of Lithium based power-packs for inclusion in its solutions. As a result of these efforts, the Company does not see Lithium as an economically viable power source for its offerings, particularly with the progressed state of development of the EESU as indicated by EEStor.
>>
I don't get that one I have to admit.
If the permittivity announcement was in April, why as late as June were they evaluating Lithium ?
It reads like they were seriously thinking of running with lithium ion while waiting for the EESU.
Maybe they started the re-evaluation before permittivity.
Either way, it's good they've dumped it if it displays their confidence in the imminent arrival of an EESU.
Damn, did I really just use that word?
Any day now
