TheEEStory.com

Quickly everyone!! We have to buy more shares!! If we don't the price may tank to its real value and at 50 cents a share that won't be pretty. What's more, with Zenn's finance raising drive, getting only even a little money from any investor will wipe out current equity holders' value if the share price continues to fall.

ZMC = GMC? (They aren't that far apart, phonetically)

LOL @dareka1, I bought in march at $2.20, I don't want to buy when it's over $4.00.

LXicon wrote:

LOL @dareka1, I bought in march at $2.20, I don't want to buy when it's over $4.00.

Great buy! Sell Monday.

---

Zawy, I can almost understand you coming to this site to discuss the science and other aspects of EEStor all the time with no personal investment, but for the life of me I can't see why you would care if someone sells or holds. And, you can call that statement a joke, but it seems that you argue against anything that might be construed as a positive for Zenn or EEStor. What's your motivation for this behavior?

---

e'er wrote:

Zawy, I can almost understand you coming to this site to discuss the science and other aspects of EEStor all the time with no personal investment, but for the life of me I can't see why you would care if someone sells or holds. And, you can call that statement a joke, but it seems that you argue against anything that might be construed as a positive for Zenn or EEStor. What's your motivation for this behavior?

Attention. Zawy is a bright guy who, like Excoriator/Tec, has found a place to get cheap and easy attention, simply by pissing on the parade of EEStor hopefuls here.

It just so happens that he may well be correct in his assessment of the claims of EEStor, but that's beside the point. He's here for attention. If it turns out that EEStor is a fraud or Weir/Nelson are deluded, then he'll crow and prance about in an irritating manner until it no longer draws attention, then he'll hie off in search of another fishing hole.

If it turns out that Weir and Nelson deliver a fully-functioning EESU to ZMC at midnight tonight, he'll stick around a bit, still claiming fraud, but in the perhaps unlikely event that the EESU is conclusively proven true - he and Tec and Y_Po will just disappear.

There's no downside to them from this - is there? (And was the report true from a few months ago that Zawy had bought 100 shares of ZMC?)

e'er wrote:

..but for the life of me I can't see why you would care if someone sells or holds. And, you can call that statement a joke, but it seems that you argue against anything that might be construed as a positive for Zenn or EEStor. What's your motivation for this behavior?

Maybe, just maybe, i wanted to give him advice so that he could maximize profit? Granted, this does nothing for society as a whole (someone else will lose what he gains), and there is no reason for me to care about him than the rest of society, so there's no charitable motivation I can claim.

As far as me posting only negative things concerning EEStor and Zenn, maybe I should point out the only other statements I've made about Zenn stock today were pro. Namely that I was the first who pointed out today that Zenn's max investment does not prove KP did not invest, and that I gave the exact way for calculating what percent of EEStor you own when you buy Zenn stock.

If I had a nickel for every time I got attacked with false information on this website....

And God forbid if the skeptics ever posted more than 1 factual error for every 10 factual errors posted by believers.

Now I see Deedletwo has chimed in with a lot of errors of fact. I wonder what his point is.

---

I'm a student of human nature. I'm watching the interplay of personalities here, and I don't know what "errors of fact" you claim I've chimed in with - care to list them?

Believers, if all they have is faith may very well be deluded and then deserve to be out in the rain if each drop is a fact.
EEStor is going ahead, making claims, a production line and likely a working EESU and many of us think that reasonable people know this and are invested in the technology.
Zawy would not mind having working EESUs rain down on him
and I am sure he would like to know how they did it. Until then he does generally seem to be skeptical and this is fine. I read his posts, seen his solar heater, and am glad he is who he is.
We are not 3rd graders on a playground.

---

zawy wrote:

e'er wrote:

..but for the life of me I can't see why you would care if someone sells or holds. And, you can call that statement a joke, but it seems that you argue against anything that might be construed as a positive for Zenn or EEStor. What's your motivation for this behavior?

Maybe, just maybe, i wanted to give him advice so that he could maximize profit? Granted, this does nothing for society as a whole (someone else will lose what he gains), and there is no reason for me to care about him than the rest of society, so there's no charitable motivation I can claim.

As far as me posting only negative things concerning EEStor and Zenn, maybe I should point out the only other statements I've made about Zenn stock today were pro. Namely that I was the first who pointed out today that Zenn's max investment does not prove KP did not invest, and that I gave the exact way for calculating what percent of EEStor you own when you buy Zenn stock.

If I had a nickel for every time I got attacked with false information on this website....

And God forbid if the skeptics ever posted more than 1 factual error for every 10 factual errors posted by believers.

Now I see Deedletwo has chimed in with a lot of errors of fact. I wonder what his point is.

Wow, I have somehow missed this positive side of you. I'll try and look harder now. I'm not sure about your "maximizing investment' theory though. If EEStor stays on schedule this year, then selling on Monday would be the worst move to make toward maximizing investment.

---

dareka1 wrote:

ZMC = GMC? (They aren't that far apart, phonetically)

Technically, since ZMC is a Canadian company, it is pronounced ZED-EM-SEE, as opposed to the U.S. pronunciation of ZEE-EM-SEE.

/keener Canuck

Let me tell a story about an phoneme named zed...

---

DeedleTwo wanted a list of which facts he got wrong:

DeedleTwo wrote:

If it turns out that EEStor is a fraud or Weir/Nelson are deluded, then he'll crow and prance about in an irritating manner until it no longer draws attention, then he'll hie off in search of another fishing hole.

two factual errors

DeedleTwo wrote:

If it turns out that Weir and Nelson deliver a fully-functioning EESU to ZMC at midnight tonight, he'll stick around a bit,

i'll stick around a lot longer

DeedleTwo wrote:

still claiming fraud

i don't know if i've claimed that in the past, but i won't claim it in the future unless it's common knowledge

DeedleTwo wrote:

but in the perhaps unlikely event that the EESU is conclusively proven true - he and Tec and Y_Po will just disappear.

Clearly another error

DeedleTwo wrote:

There's no downside to them from this - is there?

Yes, we'll be in a world of no good oil alternatives if they fail

DeedleTwo wrote:

Zawy had bought 100 shares of ZMC?

Not exactly a statement of fact that is in error, but still at least trying to instill doubt by spreading a false rumor.

So 6.5 errors in 1 post. I had not even finished typing my claim that believers make 10 times more errors than skeptics before DeedleTwo had to jump in and help prove me potentially right.

---

---

B,

use this song if you want, it has an african feel. I think it is in the public domain.

http://www.garageband.com/song?|pe1|S8LTM0LdsaSjZFSzZGA

---

zawy wrote:

e'er wrote:

..but for the life of me I can't see why you would care if someone sells or holds. And, you can call that statement a joke, but it seems that you argue against anything that might be construed as a positive for Zenn or EEStor. What's your motivation for this behavior?

Maybe, just maybe, i wanted to give him advice so that he could maximize profit? Granted, this does nothing for society as a whole (someone else will lose what he gains), and there is no reason for me to care about him than the rest of society, so there's no charitable motivation I can claim.

As far as me posting only negative things concerning EEStor and Zenn, maybe I should point out the only other statements I've made about Zenn stock today were pro. Namely that I was the first who pointed out today that Zenn's max investment does not prove KP did not invest, and that I gave the exact way for calculating what percent of EEStor you own when you buy Zenn stock.

If I had a nickel for every time I got attacked with false information on this website....

And God forbid if the skeptics ever posted more than 1 factual error for every 10 factual errors posted by believers.

Now I see Deedletwo has chimed in with a lot of errors of fact. I wonder what his point is.

Zawy, just this week you said I was wrong on post regarding 400J/cc. You said that was a combination cap/battery or something to that effect. Basic corrected you and you agreed my post was fact based and you were wrong.
You apology to me said......I hope you find some peace in your life???

That was a slam an attempt to hide your error by insinuating I have some kind of problem because I post factual data.

I don't even understand that thinking process.

Cover your error by shooting the messenger comes to mind though. No doubt I'm in for another drive by messenger shooting.

I'm with e'er on this one.

Last edited Fri, 03 Jul 2009, 4:49pm by Eenigma

---